Of course you have to have the ability to have other baseball skills but when you dont have to work as hard to get that strength as the other guy then something must be done.
While you continue to hit warning track outs, the other guy with the same talents as you gets homeruns because he has used an artificial drug to grow muscles.
Im not saying steroid users arent great baseball players, I saying that have a tremendous unfair advantage when they use steroids.
Be it in Speed, muscle growth, recovery time.
Ben Johnson was a tremendous runner, but he still cheated in the worst possible way an athlete can cheat IMO.
[IMG]http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u30/xplosiongurl/redsox.gif[/IMG]
Well, I agree with you on most points. Ben Johnson cheated. Steroids may be an advantage to baseball players, certainly speed wise. But I'm just not as sure that a gifted baseball player with the ability to hit like Barry Bonds actually benefits from steroid use and if so how much. I don't think the scientific data is absolutely convincing. Look at Jose Canseco. I would argue he performed WORSE after years of steroid use, and the last I heard he couldn't even cut it in the independent leagues. His first few years in professional baseball were successful.
And finally, as I've stated before, I'm just not convinced Barry is guilty. When it's proven, even though I'm not sold on the benefits of steroids, I will join in the uproar against Barry and his stats because it was against the rules, even if I think those rules are a bit hypocritical. The evidence looks fishy, but I need proof to deny a man his livelihood or his family the pride of his accomplishments. I recently was in court myself. I ran a stop light. It was totally unintentional, so I went to court to plead my case. It did no good, but the officer was there and provided proof of my guilt. I like the system of innocent until proven guilty, and I like it in the law as well as in life because I have seen many, many, many times that things just aren't what they seem sometimes. Sometimes something can look like a slam dunk and you find different facts later that change everything. And I do admire your demand to stick to the rules. I admire that in the law as well as life too. We'll just have to disagree on what "proof" is.
Yep. I'll quote this, again, from this article which everybody involved in any Bonds discussions owes it to themselves to read:
Further, heavy steroid usage negatively impacts player longevity. Those noted for their juicing have had their bodies break down and have been out of the game by their late 30s: Mark McGwire retired at 37, Ken Caminiti made it to 38, Jose Canseco was gone at 36. The only exception was Rafael Palmeiro, who played until 41, and here Bonds is .295/.512/.589 with 17 HR and will be 43 this month.
The simple fact that Bonds is still in the game raking despite the destructive properties of anabolic substances bears witness to the amazing biological machine that is home to the shade of Barry Bonds.
It's probably safe to say PED usage has goosed Bonds’ totals, but absent it we cannot say for certain that he might not be creeping up on Aaron; don’t forget, how many pitchers got him out because of the juice? A healthy, productive Bonds at 43 (with or without steroids) would be expected to be closing in on "The Hammer."
No court that I'm aware of would accept testimony from Joyner on the physical effects of steroids. Evidence of the physical affect of steroids would be entered as expert testimony from a medical doctor, not as eyewitness testimony from someone who saw a particular individual or individuals take steroids.
Unless Joyner is a doctor, which would be news to me.
I find this pretty unconvincing; historically, most players have had their bodies break down on them and have been out of the game in their early-to-mid 30's. DiMaggio and Mantle were both done at 36; Foxx, Sandberg, and Yount at 37.Quote:
Further, heavy steroid usage negatively impacts player longevity. Those noted for their juicing have had their bodies break down and have been out of the game by their late 30s: Mark McGwire retired at 37, Ken Caminiti made it to 38, Jose Canseco was gone at 36. The only exception was Rafael Palmeiro, who played until 41, and here Bonds is .295/.512/.589 with 17 HR and will be 43 this month.
Last edited by robinhoodnik; 08-10-2007 at 07:35 PM.
Every court I know of will accept testimony of people envolved in the case.
So if a worker in a company (who is not a doctor) eye witnessed at his plant the affects of the "alleged" chemical contamination at his work place, you are telling me the Judge would not let the jury hear his testimony because he is not a doctor.
Im sorry that is just BS.Would they need to add on to that evidence with evidence from a doctore, probably in order to win the case.
But still the eye witness testimony from the worker is STILL EVIDENCE!
[IMG]http://i164.photobucket.com/albums/u30/xplosiongurl/redsox.gif[/IMG]
Except in this case he can say "I began to feel sick after the chemicals contaminated the work place." or something similar.
Wally Joyner can't and didn't say "Steroids improved my home run numbers, made me steal more bases, etc." or anything. "Steroids would make me better" is not evidence of anything.
I'll have to see. But, keep in mind, that sample size of one player is not definitive.Originally Posted by robinhoodnik