
Originally Posted by
jcbarr
Code:
Year Ag Tm Lg G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG *OPS+ TB SH SF IBB HBP GDP
162 Game Avg 618 103 185 34 5 14 77 32 8 70 78 .300 .371 .443 116 274 10 7 4 3 14
162 Game Avg 572 111 178 32 6 16 86 23 4 87 34 .311 .409 .474 132 271 12 1 1 8 13
Pretty darn close between Robbie and Jackie. I guess that means Alomar was one of the greatest to every play the game?
Keep in mind that is a 162 game average which I think is far better to look at than the career numbers.
Another thing to keep in mind Jackie was far from the best player in the Negro Leagues at the time. He just had the personality that would fit best in the MLB world.
The one key piece missing from this analysis is factoring in the eras that the two players played in. Baseball Reference has started making "neutralized" stats available now, which is a better place to start from:
Code:
Year G AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB Avg OBP SLG OPS RC
Robinson 162 566 106 172 31 6 15 82 85 34 22 .305 .402 .463 .865 104
Alomar 162 615 100 183 34 5 14 74 69 77 32 .297 .368 .438 .806 100

Originally Posted by
maxpower
If the general consensus was "Jackie Robinson was far and away the best baseball player ever", then I would agree he would be overrated. I haven't heard anyone say that. The media has gone on and on about him recently, but I think the focus was more on the social significance of his accomplishments, and not just the baseball. I don't think his importance socially has been overrated, at least not by anything I've seen or read.
That's the real point here. Robinson isn't really great because of his playing skills at all. That gave him the opportunity to be great, and he was a very good player, but his playing skills are not why he's a HOF'er.