215 is a tad much. No ones predicted stats should equate to a ecord in any category, it really fudges results...
Printable View
215 is a tad much. No ones predicted stats should equate to a ecord in any category, it really fudges results...
How many players have you seen with this kind of predicted stat anomoly? Could just be a very rare case here and nothing much to worry about.
Here are just the ones I could find in 2075...Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorey1974
a couple more
and more...
and a couple more
And one more for good luck.
Yeah...that's too many...Appears the predicted stat generation needs to be tweaked a bit.
Yup. Anything over 30% of predicted AB would be too many. Can't think of any players who played any meaningful amount of games average worse than that over a career...Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorey1974
Did some quick research. The all time SO leader for batters was Reggie Jackson (by over 400 K's, so he is far and away the king of the whiff).
2597 in 9864, 26.3% K's over a career.
The top guy above had 5180 in 10528 AB, or 49.2% k's over his career.
The statistical equivalent of someone hitting 1500 home runs...