When did steroid usage PEAK?
When did steroid usage reach its PEAK in Major League Baseball?
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
michaelg123789
How would you know?
You have something you want to share with us Dabs?
Don't question dabs, just look at his avatar!
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
I bumped this :( I went to vote and then I realized that it bumps it up. Oops!
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
I bumped this :( I went to vote and then I realized that it bumps it up. Oops!
I'm impressed you even found it lol
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
200tang
I'm impressed you even found it lol
I was going through the online users list and some Guest was looking at it.
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Brady Anderson....that is all
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
who's to say it has peaked?
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ragecage
Brady Anderson....that is all
Davey Johnson?
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
wow houston, nice..
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
I'm gonna say it hasn't peaked.
Here are some interesting numbers and names: the first number for each player is their lifetime 162 GP avg for HR, the second is their career high for HR, and the third is the year the career high was achieved.
As HGM said 1st up Davey Johnson: 15, 43, 1973
As rage said next up Brady Anderson: 19, 50, 1996
Then we have Luis Gonzalez: 22, 57, 2001
Then we kick it old school with Cy Williams: 20, 41, 1923
How about Roger ("the original asterisk") Maris?: 30, 61, 1961
Finally one I was stunned to see: Yaz: 22, 44, 1967
Just because these guys are here doesn't mean they enhanced their performance in any way, at least we'll never be able to prove it. I only looked at guys whose career high for HR was 40 or higher and for whom the career 162 game average was one half of that or lower. The 162 game career average of course includes the career high. This is far from a scientific study. It's just interesting especially the fact that only 2 of the six examples are from the "steroid" era.
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
actionjackson
I'm gonna say it hasn't peaked.
Here are some interesting numbers and names: the first number for each player is their lifetime 162 GP avg for HR, the second is their career high for HR, and the third is the year the career high was achieved.
As HGM said 1st up Davey Johnson: 15, 43, 1973
As rage said next up Brady Anderson: 19, 50, 1996
Then we have Luis Gonzalez: 22, 57, 2001
Then we kick it old school with Cy Williams: 20, 41, 1923
How about Roger ("the original asterisk") Maris?: 30, 61, 1961
Finally one I was stunned to see: Yaz: 22, 44, 1967
Just because these guys are here doesn't mean they enhanced their performance in any way, at least we'll never be able to prove it. I only looked at guys whose career high for HR was 40 or higher and for whom the career 162 game average was one half of that or lower. The 162 game career average of course includes the career high. This is far from a scientific study. It's just interesting especially the fact that only 2 of the six examples are from the "steroid" era.
But, unfortunately with the steroid issue, most are guilty until proven innocent.
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
I think it was way worse before we really knew about it.
Re: When did steroid usage PEAK?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
actionjackson
I'm gonna say it hasn't peaked.
Here are some interesting numbers and names: the first number for each player is their lifetime 162 GP avg for HR, the second is their career high for HR, and the third is the year the career high was achieved.
As HGM said 1st up Davey Johnson: 15, 43, 1973
As rage said next up Brady Anderson: 19, 50, 1996
Then we have Luis Gonzalez: 22, 57, 2001
Then we kick it old school with Cy Williams: 20, 41, 1923
How about Roger ("the original asterisk") Maris?: 30, 61, 1961
Finally one I was stunned to see: Yaz: 22, 44, 1967
Just because these guys are here doesn't mean they enhanced their performance in any way, at least we'll never be able to prove it. I only looked at guys whose career high for HR was 40 or higher and for whom the career 162 game average was one half of that or lower. The 162 game career average of course includes the career high. This is far from a scientific study. It's just interesting especially the fact that only 2 of the six examples are from the "steroid" era.
If players only took steroids/hgh/whatever else for 1 season or steroids only enhance your performance for 1 season, then I believe this would be more useful information. As it stands at the moment, I think it's more of an interesting info tidbit