-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BINGLEBOP
I don't know if I could live in a state where Rick Santorum won its caucus. Oh ****, I do.
Don't worry, so do I.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OregonDuck1989
Don't worry, so do I.
And I love Colorado. I was tempted to type the past tense of that, but the Rockies still narrowly win out over the Santorumness.
I wonder if any of my friends are Santorum supporters. If so, I wonder if they should still be my friends.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
The Republicans have brought their freak show to Wisconsin.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Dan Riehl called me the "face of pussification in America" because I replied to this tweet by him:
Quote:
How am I supposed to get worked up about the so called war on women, when these people have been waging war on men for 3 damned decades?
with:
Quote:
@DanRiehl lolwut. that's all can be said about 95% of your posts. A man complaining about being oppressed by women. ****ING LOL
Serious lol.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Oh god, it gets better.
Some random old dude said "Love the Warcraft shirt and Dungeons and Dragons reference. Future of America!!" (I'm wearing a shirt of the band A Day to Remember, not a Warcraft shirt)
And this Dan Riehl character replied with "Yeah, must suck looking forward to a life of being yelled at by a hairy, fat, dumb broad. I almost feel sorry for him."
lololololololololololol
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Dan Riehl called me the "face of pussification in America" because I replied to this tweet by him:
with:
Serious lol.
hgm = face of pussification of america
lol ;)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Oh god, it gets better.
Some random old dude said "Love the Warcraft shirt and Dungeons and Dragons reference. Future of America!!" (I'm wearing a shirt of the band A Day to Remember, not a Warcraft shirt)
And this Dan Riehl character replied with "Yeah, must suck looking forward to a life of being yelled at by a hairy, fat, dumb broad. I almost feel sorry for him."
lololololololololololol
i just read all that, my oh my is that good stuff.
If he thinks women are waging a war on men, does that mean he wont sleep with the enemy? Meaning he is a geigh that likes hobo porn.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Dan Riehl called me the "face of pussification in America"
WOW! That's a claim to fame! New user title?
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Dan Riehl can eat a salted bag of dicks. He's always been a complete wad.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Attachment 37928
I know conservatives may not be as educated, typically...but you should be able to get the name of the continent right, no?
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Considering how the gov't is now labeling those at Occupy as domestic terrorists, maybe this Amercia is the place to be.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
It's simply them coming clean about domestic espionage, man! AmeriCIA?! NOT A MISTAKE, MAN! We gotta fight the man...man!
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/05...raight-fs.html
Guess this shouldn't surprise anyone. Mittens Rmoney gives Obama "straight Fs." I guess it's the only kind of partisan rhetoric acceptable when every single maneuver by the GOP since Obama was named the Democratic nominee was intended to destroy his presidency.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
No A for his foreign policy? What gives Neo Cons?
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Hey ragecage, sorry about Buddy leaving the race. I know you're a Gary Johnson supporter, but you and Buddy were close there. If you need to talk through these tough times, I'm here for you.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ragecage
No A for his foreign policy? What gives Neo Cons?
I know, figured they'd love THAT. Obama is simultaneously a neocon's wet dream and teh worst foreign policy prez ever, becaue he tilted his head toward another world leader and WE CANT HAVE THAT NOW CAN WE
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Romney wants us to judge him on his record as Governer. Sweet!
http://www.barackobama.com/romney/ec...0120601_sc_act
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Obama has changed from figuratively killing people with his healthcare abomination, to ACTUALLY killing them!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ncid=webmail11
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Attachment 38482
Time to move to Missouri
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kobie
Mormon takeover lol
Don't diss the THUNDERHAWK
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
http://www.edgeboston.com/news/polit...bathroom_visit
Quote:
BOISE, Idaho (AP) - Former Republican U.S. Sen. Larry Craig aims to fend off a federal election lawsuit against him by arguing his infamous June 11, 2007, Minneapolis airport bathroom visit that ended in his sex-sting arrest was part of his official Senate business.
Craig is hoping to avoid repaying $217,000 in campaign funds the Federal Election Commission claims he misused to defend himself.
...
Craig counters that money tied to his airport bathroom trip was for neither personal use nor his campaign, but fell under his official, reimbursable duties as senator because he was traveling between Idaho and the nation’s capital for work.
He cites a U.S. Senate rule in which reimbursable per diem expenses include all charges for meals, lodging, hotel fans, cleaning, pressing of clothing - and bathrooms.
"Not only was the trip itself constitutionally required, but Senate rules sanction reimbursement for any cost relating to a senator’s use of a bathroom while on official travel," wrote Andrew Herman, Craig’s lawyer in Washington, D.C., in documents filed Thursday.
LOL
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
As if finishing dead last in education wasn't enough now Mississippi is also the fattest state in the country.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow...192426230.html
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Anagrams mean something, right,
Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan = My ultimate Ayn Rand porn
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
filihok
Anagrams mean something, right,
Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan = My ultimate Ayn Rand porn
This is so true it isn't even funny.
I hate this country more and more each passing day.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MichelleWie
I saw this earlier. What a prick.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Kobie
I saw this earlier. What a prick.
I enjoyed the part we he misspoken, I'm sure if he said the exact opposite, which would make the conservaderps mad, he would say the samething. Tired of peoples ****.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/21/op...=2&ref=opinion
Moore and Oliver Stone on Assange and the dangers of extraditing him
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OregonDuck1989
*Extraditing
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
*Extraditing
Yeah that, just woke up.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Why I hate the GOP. Two party system makes all the rules to prevent the rise of a 3rd, in my eyes legitimate person to run our country.
http://paindependent.com/2012/08/rep...lvania-ballot/
Quote:
HARRISBURG — The Pennsylvania Republican Party has already booted one third-party candidate from the state’s presidential ballot and is making life difficult for Libertarian Party presidential nominee Gary Johnson.
Republican voters acting on behalf of the state GOP this week officially challenged the signatures submitted by Johnson, the former governor of New Mexico, who is seeking an equal place on the November ballot beside major party candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney.
Libertarian Party presidential nominee and former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson could be knocked off the ballot in Pennsylvania by the Republican Party.
Ron Nielson, senior adviser for the Johnson campaign, told PA Independent on Wednesday that the campaign submitted more than 49,000 signatures — more than twice the amount required to gain access to the ballot in Pennsylvania.
He said the campaign expected to survive the challenge from the Republicans.
“The two major parties have a lot of money they can use to maintain the status quo,” he said. “We’re trying to give the voters a choice between the policies of Obama and Romney, and we’re going to fight to stay on the ballot because we think the voters deserve to have that choice.”
The signatures will be challenged in Commonwealth Court.
Thursday is the final day for a candidate to qualify for the ballot, but the court could strike a candidate from the ballot after that date if it was determined they did not have enough signatures following a challenge.
In order to qualify for the ballot in Pennsylvania, the major parties have to submit only 2,000 signatures, but third party candidates had to collect more than 20,000 this year.
The process is fundamentally unfair, and the major parties have plenty of resources to go to war against candidates they are concerned may slice into their share of the vote.
“The two major parties are preventing democracy from taking place in Pennsylvania,” said Robert Small, facilitator for the Pennsylvania Ballot Access Coalition, which fights for the equal access for all parties. Small is a registered member of the Green Party.
Even if there isn’t a challenge, the third parties have to spend time and resources gathering all those signatures that could otherwise be used campaigning, Small said.
In 2006, Pennsylvania was named by the Helsinki Accords as one of the worst places in the world to have a free election. The Helsinki Accords is an international group that monitors elections. The group specifically pointed to Pennsylvania as an example of how ballot access laws in the United States limit some groups’ rights to participate in elections.
Other third parties also have felt the heavy hand of the two party oligarchy.
The Constitution Party withdrew its presidential candidate, Virgil Goode, from the state ballot on Tuesday. The party submitted 35,000 signatures, but state law would have required them to cover the cost of legal fees if the Republicans had been able to successfully challenge enough of the signatures to bring them under the state threshold.
Jim Clymer, a lawyer and state treasurer for the Pennsylvania Constitution Party, said those fees could have easily exceeded $100,000.
“We pulled out because we were threatened with having to pay their legal fees if we did not prevail,” he said. “The numbers made it appear doubtful that we would be able to survive.”
Valerie Caras, spokeswoman for the Pennsylvania Republican Party, said Wednesday the party was fighting to protect the integrity of the ballot by challenging the Libertarian and Constitution candidates.
“Our Commonwealth’s election guidelines require nominating petitions to contain legitimate signatures of registered voters. Upon close inspection, neither set of nominating petitions meets that standard,” she wrote in an email.
The battle over signatures is the second ballot access battle Johnson’s campaign has had to fight this week in the Keystone State.
On Tuesday night, Johnson had to fly cross-country from New Mexico to Pennsylvania in order to re-sign documents in front of officials at the Pennsylvania Department of State on Wednesday morning.
The issue: Johnson’s original submission lacked an apostille – a form of certification for documents similar to having something notarized – and was deemed invalid by state officials on Tuesday.
“The Republican Party has a room full of lawyers who can go through and challenge these signatures and all we have is a bunch of volunteers who have taken off from work to collect the signatures and fight the challenges,” Nielson said.
He said the Libertarian Party is on the ballot in 36 states and in the process of qualifying for the ballot in the remaining 14 states plus the District of Columbia.
Pennsylvania has more than 4.1 million registered Democrats and nearly 3.1 million registered Republicans, according to the latest voter registration figures.
There are fewer than 1.1 million people in the state registered at members of third parties or as registered independents.
Even so, the major parties have reason to fear those small groups of people, said Terry Madonna, a professor of political science at Franklin and Marshall College in Lancaster.
“In a close election, they don’t want the minor party to drain votes away from their candidates,” Madonna said. “It’s rare that it makes a difference, but we saw it make a difference in Florida in 2000.”
In that instance, Green Party candidate Ralph Nader won 97,000 votes in Florida, while the gap between Republican candidate George W. Bush and Democratic candidate Al Gore was fewer than 540 votes.
Also Republicans are ****ing dumb. They act like if they have their way with Johnson, all the votes that would be for Johnson would go towards Romney. Further from the truth, I for one will either not vote, or vote out of spite against the Republicans for their ****. (Probably just not vote)
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ragecage
Why I hate the GOP. Two party system makes all the rules to prevent the rise of a 3rd, in my eyes legitimate person to run our country.
http://paindependent.com/2012/08/rep...lvania-ballot/
Also Republicans are ****ing dumb. They act like if they have their way with Johnson, all the votes that would be for Johnson would go towards Romney. Further from the truth, I for one will either not vote, or vote out of spite against the Republicans for their ****. (Probably just not vote)
If it makes you feel better, the Libertarian Party here in WA. State are trying to get Romney off the ballot here.
http://www.spokesman.com/blogs/spinc...hington-ballot
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
asianinvasion
Would be funny, wont happen though.
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Does Ann Coulter believe the **** she says?
http://observer.com/2007/10/coulter-culture/
-
Re: Official "What are you thinking about right now?" (Political Version)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
OregonDuck1989
Don't all insane people?