-
Required reading (Re: The Contest)
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
The criticism wasn't specifically regarding signing Tatis. Rather, it was a criticism of the entire process that included a plan to enter the season with a Murphy/Tatis platoon while wasting resources on Gary Matthews Jr. that could've been spent on a better first basemen.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
It's funny because even the comments are telling him he's wrong. Not even any love on your own site. At least he has MG, though.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
And no, unlike what the original article stated, Ryan Garko is absolutely not the solution at first base.
FYI also, it's going to be mostly Murphy at first base if I understand correctly. Tatis was signed because he can play 6 positions decently and can hit respectably.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
And no, unlike what the original article stated, Ryan Garko is absolutely not the solution at first base.
He's better than Murphy, or a Murphy/Tatis platoon.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
FYI also, it's going to be mostly Murphy at first base if I understand correctly.
Yeah! Belowleague average hitter at first base! Awesome!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
Tatis was signed because he can play 6 positions decently and can hit respectably.
Having played 6 positions in the past does not mean he can play 6 positions decently.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Having played 6 positions in the past does not mean he can play 6 positions decently.
He plays a good enough 1B, 3B, LF, RF, I guess 2B and SS are debatable.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
He plays a good enough 1B, 3B, LF, RF, I guess 2B and SS are debatable.
He's played like 5 games each at 2B and SS, and is an average at best corner man and is 35 years old. He can't play 2B and SS decently unless decently means "can stand in the field at that position for a couple of innings if absolutely needed" in which case Adam Dunn is a decent fielder.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Yeah! Belowleague average hitter at first base! Awesome!!!
I couldn't care less what he hits. We have plenty of big boppers in our lineup. I know however that he at least last year played a very strong defensive first base.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
I couldn't care less what he hits.
And this is why nobody listens to you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
We have plenty of big boppers in our lineup.
Uh, yeah. :rolleyes: lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
I know however that he at least last year played a very strong defensive first base.
Good for him. He's still not good.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
He's played like 5 games each at 2B and SS, and is an average at best corner man and is 35 years old. He can't play 2B and SS decently unless decently means "can stand in the field at that position for a couple of innings if absolutely needed" in which case Adam Dunn is a decent fielder.
Yep I'm sorry. Fernando Tatis is awful. Ryan Garko is amazing. The Mets stand no chance in 2010 and will lose 100 games at least. I apologize for going against all of your infallible opinions.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
Yep I'm sorry. Fernando Tatis is awful. Ryan Garko is amazing. The Mets stand no chance in 2010 and will lose 100 games at least. I apologize for going against all of your infallible opinions.
Brush up on your reading comprehension and stop reading what you want to read and read what is actually written.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
And this is why nobody listens to you.
OH MY GOD.... when I stress hitting over defense, nope wrong... when I stress defense over hitting, nope still wrong... stop contradicting me just for your own sake
Quote:
Uh, yeah. :rolleyes: lol
Jason Bay, Carlos Beltran, David Wright, Jose Reyes
Quote:
Good for him. He's still not good.
Metsguy234 (11:07:18 AM): if I told you "Why the **** did the Mets sign Fernando Tatis, he sucks" you'd be defending him
straightoutofhxc (11:07:26 AM): because that would be retarded too.
If this **** continues, I'm leaving. I can say "the sky is blue" and you'll find a reason to contradict me.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
OH MY GOD.... when I stress hitting over defense, nope wrong... when I stress defense over hitting, nope still wrong... stop contradicting me just for your own sake
I'm not. I don't stress defense over hitting or hitting over defense. I stress overall value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
Metsguy234 (11:07:18 AM): if I told you "Why the **** did the Mets sign Fernando Tatis, he sucks" you'd be defending him
straightoutofhxc (11:07:26 AM): because that would be retarded too.
Because Fernando Tatis doesn't suck and signing him wasn't stupid in and of itself.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
If this **** continues, I'm leaving. I can say "the sky is blue" and you'll find a reason to contradict me.
No.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
]
Because Fernando Tatis doesn't suck and signing him wasn't stupid in and of itself.
So... you're attacking him... but he doesn't suck... but he's not good... but you're defending him
You're contradicting yourself multiple times in the SAME THREAD
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
So... you're attacking him... but he doesn't suck... but he's not good... but you're defending him
You're contradicting yourself multiple times in the SAME THREAD
No, I'm not. Like I said, you are unable to comprehend, apparently.
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoustonGM
The criticism wasn't specifically regarding signing Tatis. Rather, it was a criticism of the entire process that included a plan to enter the season with a Murphy/Tatis platoon while wasting resources on Gary Matthews Jr. that could've been spent on a better first basemen.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Please tell me the "better first baseman" that they could have signed.
And wait... they're only paying GMJ 1.5 million per year. For a big market team, that's not exactly "wasting resources".
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
Please tell me the "better first baseman" that they could have signed.
Already did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
And wait... they're only paying GMJ 1.5 million per year. For a big market team, that's not exactly "wasting resources".
That's money that could've been used to sign a better first basemen.... you know, as I've said already.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Already did.
That's money that could've been used to sign a better first basemen.... you know, as I've said already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Sabean has job security because of the season the Giants are having. He seems to be a very hit or miss type GM, and I think his misses outweigh his hits. He has excelled at assembling a pitching staff, particularly recently with the likes of Lincecum and Cain, but until Sandoval and Posey, the Giants hadn't produced a position player from their system in something like a decade, and that's a huge part of the reason why their offense is so bad. He's made some terrible signings - Michael Tucker a while ago moments before the arbitration deadline, costing the Giants a draft pick that they would've kept had he waited for the deadline to pass before signing Tucker, Barry Zito of course...and some terrible trades, most famously the A.J. Pierzynski for Joe Nathan, Francisco Liriano and Boof Bonser deal, but also the two trades this year for Freddy Sanchez and Ryan Garko. For a while, he had some weird fetish with old veterans, signing tons of mid-30's players and hoping for the best...and that sort of works when you have the best hitter in history at his peak playing for you, but once that guy's gone, it leaves a team of over-the-hill nobodies...Lots of negatives, and I don't think his positives are anything special.
Minaya is a so-so GM but the injuries this year highlighted the extreme lack of depth that is partially his fault.
I love how literally that whole post fits this situation.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
You said the Garko trade was terrible, and that Omar Minaya was an okay GM, but that he needed to work on adding more depth.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
You said the Garko trade was terrible
Your point?
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
and that Omar Minaya was an okay GM, but that he needed to work on adding more depth.
I said he was a so-so GM. My opinion of him has soured since I wrote that (and remember, it wasn't a high opinion then).
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Your point?
I said he was a so-so GM. My opinion of him has soured since I wrote that (and remember, it wasn't a high opinion then).
1) You said Garko would be a good fit for the Mets at 1B.
2) Why?
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
1) You said Garko would be a good fit for the Mets at 1B.
I said he'd be better than Murphy/Tatis and is probably the best option left available.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
2) Why?
Because of the multiple front office mishaps (the Tony Bernazard incident, issue with Carlos Beltran, etc.) and his offseason.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Because of the multiple front office mishaps (the Tony Bernazard incident, issue with Carlos Beltran, etc.) and his offseason.
I think his offseason has been pretty okay. He filled a hole in left field (Bay), he made a couple of bad pickups (GMJ, Cora) for pretty low prices, he made a bunch of solid signings for the major league club (Blanco, Igarashi, Escobar, Tatis), and signed some minor league depth (Fogg, Catalanotto, Hessman, Everts, etc).
Also, how the hell is what Tony Bernazard did his fault?
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
You guys might not have needed to sign all that shitty depth if you guys hadn't traded it all to the Mariners. WOOT!
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
I think his offseason has been pretty okay. He filled a hole in left field (Bay)
By overpaying.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
he made a bunch of solid signings for the major league club (Blanco, Igarashi, Escobar, Tatis) and signed some minor league depth (Fogg, Catalanotto, Hessman, Everts, etc)
Oh! Great GM!
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
Also, how the hell is what Tony Bernazard did his fault?
It's part of a series of issues that indicates that the FO just simply isn't very organized.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
By overpaying.
I'd rather overpay for Bay than have a lesser player in left field.
Uh... considering depth was one of our major problems last year... yeah it was pretty good that he's working on that.
Look, I'm not saying he's the best GM in the world. He's just not as mindblowingly terrible as you guys make him out to be.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
200tang
You guys might not have needed to sign all that shitty depth if you guys hadn't traded it all to the Mariners. WOOT!
You guys didn't get anything too great from us in that trade.
A backup OF (who is a FA now anyway), a meh 1B prospect who was trapped behind Ike Davis in NY, a good OF prospect, a solid pitching prospect, and Jason Vargas.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
You guys didn't get anything too great from us in that trade.
A backup OF (who is a FA now anyway), a meh 1B prospect who was trapped behind Ike Davis in NY, a good OF prospect, a solid pitching prospect, and Jason Vargas.
That's called depth.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
I'd rather overpay for Bay than have a lesser player in left field.
Even if it wasn't a long term deal, I'd agree.
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
Uh... considering depth was one of our major problems last year... yeah it was pretty good that he's working on that.
Signing 30 year olds to round out the AAA roster isn't what anybody means by "depth."
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
Look, I'm not saying he's the best GM in the world. He's just not as mindblowingly terrible as you guys make him out to be.
He's mediocre if you're being very generous.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Signing 30 year olds to round out the AAA roster isn't what anybody means by "depth."
Well what is "depth" then? Do we need veritable all-stars waiting in AAA?
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
Well what is "depth" then? Do we need veritable all-stars waiting in AAA?
Yep. That's what I said.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
Yep. That's what I said.
You said 30 year-old players in AAA don't count as true "depth". What does count as depth then?
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
You said 30 year-old players in AAA don't count as true "depth". What does count as depth then?
I should've said "crappy 30+ year old players."
Having decent backups and upside plays is depth.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
I should've said "crappy 30+ year old players."
Having decent backups and upside plays is depth.
What is an upside play?
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Catalanotto is 10 LBS of suck stuffed into a 5LB sack...
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
What is an upside play?
A guy that has upside.
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
A guy that has upside.
lol
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HoustonGM
A guy that has upside.
So signing veterans to minor league deals is a bad thing?
-
Re: Required reading (Re: The Contest)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
metsguy234
So signing veterans to minor league deals is a bad thing?
This is what I mean by reading comprehension.