Award for Relievers?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by free2131

Dan Kolb should have won the Rolaids Reliever of the Year in 2005. Hell, there wasn't a game he was in that year that I didn't need antacid for...

---

David Aardsma had that affect on me this year too, but he actually got results.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 200tang

David Aardsma had that affect on me this year too, but he actually got results.

---

I will haunt your dreams.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tannhauser

Given the situation in this past playoff where seemingly plenty of top notch closers blew and lost games to walkoffs, how would you value a great closer who is virtually automatic?

---

The best closers generally are worth around 3 or so Wins Above Replacement. To put it in perspective, a true MVP candidate is usually around 7-8.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JustPats

It shouldn't. Cy Young winners aren't ineligible for the MVP. Cy Young is a subset of the MVP voting. Best reliever is a subset of the Cy Young. How about we all vote and call it the Baseball Mogul Fireman Award.

---

We do: http://forum.sportsmogul.com/showthread.php?t=199262 :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ragecage

Well, they do give the Rolaids Reliever of the Year award.

---

That's decided purely by a statistical formula, not a vote.

So, instead of the Rolaids award, "regurgitated by a save based formula", we can have an award voted on by the same dumbasses that vote for all the other awards, who will just focus on saves anyway because they are indeed dumb?

No thanks.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoustonGM

The best closers generally are worth around 3 or so Wins Above Replacement. To put it in perspective, a true MVP candidate is usually around 7-8.


We do: http://forum.sportsmogul.com/showthread.php?t=199262 :)


That's decided purely by a statistical formula, not a vote.

---

I will go with that over bs writers anyday.