http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/07/sp...html?th&emc=th
Printable View
Only time will tell, but my best guess is that it will be a hitter's park overall, but probably not a good park for home runs. Of course, it it's a poor home run park, a lot of people are going to think that means it's a pitchers' park, regardless of its othe effects.
HGM actually already posted something on this subject, let me find it real quick.
I hope that it won't be a pitchers park, pitching duels bore the hell out of me.
You can not claim that you are a baseball fan after that statement.Quote:
Originally Posted by metsguy234
?Quote:
Originally Posted by gosensgo101
They do bore me, I like to see hits, runs, HR. Anything else is pretty boring.
I gotta admit I love pitching more than offense. Given the choice between watching a guy dominate hitters or a lineup demolish a pitcher, I would much rather watch the pitcher dominate. Eventually watching a team demolish a pitcher gets super boring.
The most boring thing for me is a blowout or watching a team score 5+ runs in the first inning.
Am I one of the few baseball fans that just doesn't care what type of game it is, as long as it's baseball?
Probably :P
It's not that we care what type it is, it's just that lots of fans have games they enjoy more than others; or maybe it's just me >.>
I still remember the game Greg Maddux threw for the Braves in... 1998 I think. He pitched a complete game on something like 85 pitches.
Damn, I'm gonna miss him.
I missed todays RJ games on MLB network today cause my girlfriend :'(
Thanks Tang (& HGM)Quote:
Originally Posted by 200tang
Yeah Greg Maddux was a joy to watch ;)
More on the new Mets' stadium
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/08/op...&emc=thstadium