http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/9134384?MSNHPHMA
mods please merge this with the other thread, I could not find it...
Printable View
http://msn.foxsports.com/other/story/9134384?MSNHPHMA
mods please merge this with the other thread, I could not find it...
Maybe one of the religious persons who frequent these forums can tell me what a 'christlike and honorable approach to competition' means.Quote:
This clearly does not reflect a Christlike and honorable approach to competition
To me it means you dont play to physically hurt someone, you don't take anger out on other team, you play your best, etc....
So, it doesn't apply in the slightest to beating a team 100 - 0?
I feel like im going to be like this when I get older. :52 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2n34eeXWjUQ
I love how people, and I am in no way referring to anyone in this forum nbut just society in general, try to act like Christians should not be competitive or play hard. I just don't see that in the Bible. I also don't see God favoring one team over another in sports events period but that is a whole other discussion.
To answer your question though no I don't see anything about how many points yo are allowed to score in a game anywhere in the Bible.
This is why the coach got canned, according to the ahem...headmasterQuote:
This clearly does not reflect a Christlike and honorable approach to competition
as I mentioned earlier...I think you are doing more of a disservice if you tell your team "these guys suck, play 50%". Pressing the whole game might be a bit unsportsman, but, you have to play"
nice, now religion is going to overwhelm this thread. *sigh*
Has any article said if winning team had their scrubs in or not?
I read the original article, and I think the winning team only had a few players themselves. I want to say they had only 6, but that seems low.
I'd guess the celebratory attitude and making a goal of reaching 100 points are probably what the headmaster was getting at. It's also probably relevant that they didn't fire him immediately. He posted his response on another site, then was fired and the head of the school was quoted as saying that now the coach "now only represents himself" when discussing the game. So it seems like at least in part they didn't like how he was representing the school after the game became an issue.Quote:
A parent who attended the game said Covenant continued to make 3-pointers — even in the fourth quarter. She praised the Covenant players but said spectators and an assistant coach were cheering wildly as their team edged closer to 100 points.
That quote is from the Dallas Morning News, which has more complete coverage on this than the sports sites if anyone is interested in getting it in-depth:Quote:
Dallas Academy coaches and administrators say Covenant kept the pressure on until it reached 100 points midway through the fourth quarter.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcont...u.2781526.html
There's a box within the article with links to several others from over the past days.
Well I hope the girls from the wining team are proud of themselves! How dare they play so well. Now their coach has lost his job. I hope they think twice before winning again! This should teach them that mediocrity is the rule of thumb now. It's ok to win but not by much. When faced with a weak opponent it is better to play poorly yourself so as to not make the weaker team look bad. We don't want the weaker players to feel bad. Cheering for the victor is bad as well.
Oh how I wish the game had ended 2-0......!
There's nothing Christlike or honorable about not doing your best.
The winning team has nothing to be ashamed of.
Yes they do....people felt bad...how dare they make people who could not perform well feel bad....that's not PC!
I'll say I can kind of see it from both sides. I would like to see tape of the game. The losing coach said that the game was taped by the home team; they should release that and let people see exactly what happened.
From what I've read it wasn't so much 3-pointers. The opposing coach said that most of the second half was "a layup drill." Pressing defense, steal at half court, break down for a layup.Quote:
Again, my problem (and I think a lot of other people were basically in agreement) wasn't the fact they kept playing hard. My problem was the fact they're still bombing away with constant 3 point shots when already leading by 70, 80, 90 points.
Again, let's see the tape.
I'm pretty much a competitive person, by the way, but when I'm playing almost any game or sport against someone who I can obviously beat easily, I ease up. Yeah, I don't like to make people feel bad. So go ahead and deride me as "PC." And tell me that "there's nothing Christlike" in my attitude. Of course that might convince me that your knowledge of Jesus came from watching the characters with that name on South Park and Family Guy, but I wouldn't tell you that I felt that way because doing so wouldn't be PC. ;)
It really is no different then the kid who got a whole little league team disbanded for being so good....we are encouraging our kids to be mediocre....
When I was a kid we were taught to be good sports, shake hands win or lose, give a complement....move on.....
Now you have to make sure everyone sucks before people are happy.
You might look in Galatians:
"But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. Against such things there is no law. Those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the sinful nature with its passions and desires. Since we live by the Spirit, let us keep in step with the Spirit. Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other."
Nowhere does it say how many points you are to score in a basketball game...but there is a great deal said about how you are to conduct your life in a Christ-like manner. (Shame it's such a "PC" lesson...)
Regardless, even if these were non-Christian teams, pasting a team 100-0 doesn't prove anything. You're not teaching the value of athletic prowess, you're not showing a single thing about how "good" you are. Think of it this way: what if you were a scout for a college? If you saw that game, would you look at the players on the winning team and think that they were worth a scholarship?
There is no way in Hell the coach should have been fired...absolutely ridiculous. Unless he did something egregious that we just haven't heard about, I don't see how in the world this is a fire-able offense.
Of course, we all know how this story plays out...within 2 weeks the coach will be starting up a lawsuit against the local district school board for improper dismissal.
I wonder if now, the losing teams classmates are going to make fun of them for being so awful they got the other teams coach fired. lol