Ranking the top pitchers since the 1940's

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavelb1

How long was Koufax great? How long was Bob Gibson great?

'Sucked ass'? I'll bet his cumulative Mets numbers are over 110+ ERA.

---

Even with his "bad" Mets years he is 2nd ALL TIME on ERA+ ! :rolleyes: Just Imagine if HE DIDNT pitch post 2004 what those numbers would be LOL

example 2000 ERA+ 291 !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

My list was the most accurate so far

---

Glavine is deserviing of that star and MAYBE pedro, but johnson and maddux... ur smokin something

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Pedro proved he can't pitch when alot is on the line, like when his team is good

---

Uh, what? He got injured, so that means, he can't pitch when a lot is on the line?

Also, he played for good teams in Boston.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

For about 10 years... and then he went to the Mets and sucked ass

---

so did Glavine lol yet you have him ranked

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoustonGM

Uh, what? He got injured, so that means, he can't pitch when a lot is on the line?

Also, he played for good teams in Boston.

---

Boston's 2004 win was a fluke, we all know it. And yes, he always gets hurt under pressure.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Pedro proved he can't pitch when alot is on the line, like when his team is good

---

lol um... he won the ws with the sox... or are u too young to remember that???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheNamelessPoet

so did Glavine lol yet you have him ranked

---

Glavine did good with the Mets though... and it's not like I can pick who got on the list

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Boston's 2004 win was a fluke, we all know it.

---

Uh, right. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

And yes, he always gets hurt under pressure.

---

Uh, right. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Pedro proved he can't pitch when alot is on the line, like when his team is good

---

/facepalm....well I tried.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Boston's 2004 win was a fluke, we all know it. And yes, he always gets hurt under pressure.

---

Wtf? You are showing that you are completely uneducated when it comes to baseball.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Glavine did good with the Mets though...

---

And here is where you admit your bias.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HoustonGM

And here is where you admit your bias.

---

Glavine did do good with the Mets though.


You're lying if you said Pedro did better with the Mets then Glavine did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Glavine did do good with the Mets though.

You're lying if you said Pedro did better with the Mets then Glavine did.

---

I never said that. But, you don't seem all that capable of looking beyond your team.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by metsguy234

Glavine did do good with the Mets though.


You're lying if you said Pedro did better with the Mets then Glavine did.

---

Not at all....i can't figure out to do a team by team split, but just by eyeballing it, I can see their cumulative ERA+'s are very close.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pavelb1

Not at all....i can't figure out to do a team by team split, but just by eyeballing it, I can see their cumulative ERA+'s are very close.

---

I don't care about ERA+. Glavine did better then Pedro with the Mets, and you are a fool if you think otherwise.