Clemens is no different than Bonds
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns
Year after year he peddled the same garbage, Roger Clemens was so dominant for so long because he simply outworked everyone. It played to the nation's Puritan roots, made Clemens out to be this everyman maximizing his skills through singular focus, dedication and a commitment to drinking carrot juice, or something.
It's all gone now, the legend of Rocket Roger dead on arrival of the Mitchell Report; one of the greatest pitchers of all time, his seven Cy Youngs and 354 career victories lost to history under a pile of lies and syringes.
Clemens was injected with performance-enhancing drugs and human growth hormones by his former trainer starting in 2000 and continuing many times through the years, trainer Brian McNamee told George Mitchell in great detail.
Baseball has its white Barry Bonds.
The sport has been waiting for the other shoe to drop on the 45-year-old Clemens for years. What he did defied not just age, but belief, and if there is one thing we know about Bud Selig's sorry era, it's that if something seems too good to be true, it is.
The smoking gun comes from Brian McNamee, a former New York Yankees employee who used to work as a personal trainer for Clemens and his buddy Andy Pettitte, who is also cited in the report. McNamee is also a witness in a federal investigation and spoke to Mitchell and federal investigators under the penalty of perjury. The details are in Mitchell's 300-plus page, 20-month, $30 million report released Thursday afternoon.
Clemens refused to meet with Mitchell, according to the report. "In order to provide Clemens with information about these allegations and to give him an opportunity to respond, I asked him to meet with me; he declined," Mitchell wrote.
If McNamee is wrong and Mitchell ran with it anyway, then Clemens can sue the former Congressional leader, Major League Baseball and his drug-dealing former trainer for about a billion dollars.
This report, painstakingly investigated and detailed, may be a witch hunt to cleanse Selig's soul, but it isn't operated by fools. Its extremely unlikely Mitchell and MLB would set itself up for such risk.
No matter what the defense that emerges, Clemens will struggle to ever win in the court of public opinion.
Which leaves baseball fans with the gut-punch reality that the generations' greatest hitter Bonds and greatest pitcher Clemens are nothing but drug-enhanced cautionary tales.
It is Clemens and his arrogance through the years that makes this one so distasteful. Just like Bonds, he relished in his greatness, seemed to mock all the other mortals who couldn't keep up with his workout regimens, his off-season drive, his freak of nature physical abilities.
He liked to convey that maybe anyone could do this, if they just were as tough as the Texas Con Man.
And just like Bonds, you have to wonder why it was ever necessary. Clemens was an all-time great back in the 1980s and early 1990s, when he was presumably clean. He had three Cy Youngs and a MVP by 1991, when he was just 28. He didn't need to cheat to become rich and famous.
Maybe it was ego, maybe jealousy, maybe insecurity. It hardly matters now that his deal with the devil just came painfully due.
There is a forgivable element to some of the other names. Baseball is a global game now, which is why there are too many factors involved a chance to leave third-world poverty for cash-flush America to ever end the lure of doping.
Clemens has no such excuse.
The only surprise here for anyone paying attention was that Mitchell actually caught him.
For years Bonds supporters have pointed the finger at Clemens as a sign of a media (and racial) double standard. Their guy was getting crucified daily, while Clemens was getting standing ovations and new contracts.
But until now there was never a credible link to performance-enhancing drugs. There were rumors, broad-based speculation and a tenuous mention in the Jason Grimsley affidavit. But Bonds was caught up in a federal investigation into BALCO, a prison term for Victor Conte and a mountain of other evidence.
Call it Clemens' good fortune, but there was only so much you could say. Not any longer.
Anyone who spent years spewing contempt at Bonds needs to do the same to Clemens, because there is no difference between them.
They are just two guys who had it all, foolishly went for more, and have now lost everything.
Welcome to America's pastime, pass the peanuts and cracker jacks.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Does not Suprised me for How long he been going for
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BM_MAN
Does not Suprised me for How long he been going for
yep
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
{ Year after year he peddled the same garbage, Roger Clemens was so dominant for so long because he simply outworked everyone. }
Agree, all those stories of how he worked out his arm by dragging it thru barrels of rice etc...
always reminded me of tales of Walter Paytons extreme workouts.
I recall seeing the Texas Longhorns play in the college ws.
I pulled for them strictly because of 2 guys i thought were great and would make the bigs. Schiraldi and Clemens.
I used to feel LUCKY to have noticed him at that time and
to have the opportunity to watch a player i "pegged" as a big leaguer develop into a potential hofer.
Now i just feel like a tourist who got conned at a 3 card monte.
seeing todd hundleys name doesnt exactly help, either.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MeetDaMets
e.
seeing todd hundleys name doesnt exactly help, either.
Yeah, in 1997 or 1998 he had a Huge Breakout Year in HR.
I wonder how he did that:rolleyes:
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
I am sick of PED polls. :)
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Quote:
Originally Posted by
BM_MAN
I wonder how he did that:rolleyes:
I'm sure it was just the result of all the time he put in on his
Mega-workouts with the "Johnny Bench - Batter Up" machine.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
None of the available answers even actually does answer the question asked... except for the last one. The question is posed about two individual players, but the answers lump all players into two groups.
No way to answer the question, so, no response from me.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
I am sick of PED polls and find Clemens denial interesting.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Quote:
Originally Posted by
RickD
I am sick of PED polls and find Clemens denial interesting.
i saw a rumor he is planning on suing Mitchell and MLB for 1 billion dollars...
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Good. Mitchell is also a compromised investigator IMO.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
I agree that pitchers using PEDs is equally bad as hitters using PEDs, but don't necessarily agree with the unstated assumption that the evidence against Bonds and Clemens (or against any 2 individual players) is equally compelling.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
This report was maybe the biggest waste of time in the history of baseball. It's all "he said, she said" accusations. I am to believe a locker room attendent's word as gold.
The way the statements were given also sounded fishey to me. "Injected Clemens buttocks 2 to 6 times." ??? There is no way a man would not have a pretty vivid memory of something of this magnitude.
This report has done nothing except ruin legacies and give some water cooler talk.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tapey1brad
This report was maybe the biggest waste of time in the history of baseball. This report has done nothing except ruin legacies and give some water cooler talk.
Look, the players ruined their own legacies by taking PED's in the first place, but I disagree about the effect it has on the history or baseball. I think it has a huge effect. The record books are tainted. Even if you put an asterisk next to every players name, it's still putting out the message to children that it is okay to cheat. You will still be voted into the HOF and your record will stand at the top of the books. Baseball history and future depends largely upon what happens here. Yet another scar that fans will have to endure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tapey1brad
This report was maybe the biggest waste of time in the history of baseball. It's all "he said, she said" accusations. I am to believe a locker room attendent's word as gold. The way the statements were given also sounded fishey to me. "Injected Clemens buttocks 2 to 6 times." ??? There is no way a man would not have a pretty vivid memory of something of this magnitude. This report has done nothing except ruin legacies and give some water cooler talk.
Btw, great job at parroting the latest sports pundit to weight in on the subject. You should probably read some dissenting view other than Jayson Stark about the debacle.
Re: Clemens is no different than Bonds
Quote:
seeing todd hundleys name doesnt exactly help, either.
He could have at least kept doing them after the Cubs signed him. He is to this day my most hated Cub ever, and that was before this report.